I am serving as dean of the Institute of Formation and Religious Studies, a theological institute in the Philippines. Just recently, one of the professors has been complaining about the use of AI in the research papers submitted to her by students. The ethical question is, “Is this acceptable?” If it is acceptable, to what extent? She even personally purchased an AI detector to determine the percentage of humanness of the research paper. We have an AI policy in place; however, it only allows for minimal usage, such as correcting grammar, as a tool for brainstorming, and other similar uses. The students are also asked to sign an AI declaration form.
When I was a student in this Institute, I wrote the best research papers of my academic life. It was because my mind and heart were opened and expanded. I enjoyed this experience so much that even if the professors did not require it, I would still write research and reflection papers just to satisfy myself. Of course, that was when I was in my late twenties and was a full-time student!
I am of the opinion that the use of AI technology could weaken the theological process because it is not only an exercise in writing an academic paper but an interactive and transformational process. A research paper is not merely a product of academic exercise, although it appears to be so, but a product of grace, discovery, and deepening of faith. How can AI replace that?
Sr. Patricia Lourdes “Petite” Lao, RNDM, is a religious missionary of the Congregation of Our Lady of the Missions. She earned her Doctor of Ministry degree from Regis College, Toronto School of Theology. Her doctoral thesis, titled “An Action Research Towards Developing Educational Strategies for Filipino Catholics in Response to Call to Action 59,” focused on educational and pastoral responses to reconciliation initiatives.
After completing her studies, she returned to the Philippines in 2023. She currently serves as Dean of the Institute of Formation and Religious Studies in Quezon City, Philippines.
Thanks Petite, I so appreciate this article! It really resonates with my work on the RNDM website and social media. I am also discerning how AI can be used responsibly here. I agree with you that meaningful writing and the creative process can never be replaced by technology.
Thanks for sharing. As a new journalist, I appreciate this article.
Hi Petite,
I saw your bio and I am glad you chose Canada to do you studies
— the Toronto School of Theology (Regis College) with a research interest in Indigenous-visible minority dialogue and the truth and reconciliation process is a passionate quest.
I am a semi-retired budding journalist that has an interest in traditional Indigenous sports.
My father who recently passed taught me the benefits of sport and it’s life long benefits. Presently at a young 68 years of age, I am basketball referee and will be a SloPitch softball umpire. I my spare time I aspire to be a journalist but not just because my last name is Browning. Haha! But what’s in a name, eh?
At the present time I am working on a sports article to write. I have lived in the NWT (now the NT) and my sister lives in NT in the community of Fort Simpson. I have a deep appreciation for the Indigenous culture(s).
Cheers,
Scott Browning
Thank you Petite for your incisive and insightful reflection. As you say, doing the research and the writing is what transforms the writer. And that transformation cannot be effected by AI.